The World Cancer Research Fund and the International Agency for Research on Cancer classify processed meat as a Group 1 carcinogen, meaning the evidence that processed meat causes cancer (specifically colorectal cancer) is convincing. They classify red meat as a Group 2A probable carcinogen, meaning the evidence is strong but not yet conclusive. These classifications apply to different foods with meaningfully different health profiles, and public health messaging that treats all meat as equivalent produces confusion that does not serve health outcomes.

What Processed Meat Contains That Red Meat Does Not

Processed meats including bacon, ham, sausage, salami, and hot dogs have been preserved using nitrites and nitrates, smoking, salting, or curing. These processing methods produce N-nitroso compounds in the colon, which are carcinogenic. They also produce heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from high-temperature processing. None of these compounds are present in significant quantities in unprocessed red meat. The mechanism of harm in processed meat is processing, not meat itself.

The Position on Unprocessed Red Meat

A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the Annals of Internal Medicine by Zeraatkar and colleagues found that reducing unprocessed red meat consumption was associated with only trivially small reductions in cardiovascular and cancer risk. The authors concluded that the evidence for reducing unprocessed red meat consumption was of very low certainty. Unprocessed red meat provides haem iron, zinc, B12, creatine, carnitine, and complete protein, all at high bioavailability. For adults over 35 managing muscle mass, these nutrients have meaningful value.

Share this article

LinkedInFacebookWhatsApp